Two business professionals review financial charts and compliance documents at a desk with a laptop in a modern office.

How Cannabis Businesses Should Prepare for a Potential End to 280E

A potential move of cannabis to Schedule III could eventually reshape the industry’s tax burden by ending the reach of Section 280E. But operators should not confuse political momentum with immediate relief. A CPA explains why retroactive tax refunds are unlikely and disciplined compliance still matters. From defensible cost accounting to scenario planning and entity-structure review, the smartest path is cautious preparation rather than reactive change.
Person using a calculator beside printed charts, illustrating California cannabis tax revenue totals for Q4 2025.

California Cannabis Tax Revenue Dips in Q4 2025

CDTFA reports California collected $255.1M in Q4 2025 cannabis taxes, down after Q3’s temporary rate spike.
Clenched fists of a military veteran in uniform, representing the stress and frustration of the impending 2026 medical hemp access crisis.

ASA Warns of ‘Access Crisis’ Ahead of 2026 Hemp Changes

According to a new report from Americans for Safe Access, impending federal changes to hemp definitions could strip access from veterans, seniors, and those with rare diseases who rely on full-spectrum products.
Executive desk with compliance binders and a digital checklist, representing operational preparation after cannabis rescheduling.

After Schedule III: The Hidden Costs of Cannabis Legitimacy

Rescheduling may bring long-awaited 280E relief and a new sheen of mainstream legitimacy, but it also opens the door to federal-grade oversight, GMP expectations, stricter lender requirements, and expanded liability exposure. The “extra” cash operators anticipate could be quickly absorbed by compliance upgrades, professional services, and risk management. For CEOs, COOs, and CFOs, reclassification isn’t a finish line. It’s the starting gun for a tougher operational race.
Legal documents and a gavel representing questions about the federal rulemaking process for cannabis rescheduling.

Cannabis Rescheduling FAQ: Your Questions Answered

What cannabis rescheduling to Schedule III really means, how the process works, and why it matters for businesses and patients.
The U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C., representing the federal administrative process for cannabis rescheduling.

Cannabis Rescheduling Explained: What Moving Marijuana to Schedule III Would Change

Rescheduling marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III would not legalize cannabis — but it could fundamentally alter how the federal government treats the plant. From tax policy and medical research to regulatory oversight, here’s what cannabis rescheduling actually means, how the process works, and why it matters to businesses, patients, and policymakers.
President Donald Trump delivers remarks after signing an executive order to reclassify marijuana, directing federal agencies to expedite cannabis rescheduling from Schedule I to Schedule III.

Trump Signs Executive Order to Expedite Cannabis Rescheduling to Schedule III

President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing the Attorney General to expedite the rescheduling of marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III — a move that could eliminate 280E taxation for cannabis businesses but still requires formal DEA rulemaking. While the White House framed the order as “common sense,” opposition from congressional Republicans and unresolved administrative hearings leave the timeline uncertain.
lClose-up of a Lady Justice statue with sunlight flaring behind it, symbolizing federal law and policy.

DoJ Shift: Stricter Marijuana Enforcement on Federal Lands

Wyoming’s U.S. attorney said marijuana possession on federal lands will face strict prosecution under revised Justice Department guidance.
Toronto skyline with economic growth indicator symbolizing polling that shows Canadians want the federal government to support the cannabis industry.

Most Canadians See Cannabis as Economic Priority

New polling shows most Canadians want Ottawa to support legal cannabis as an economic opportunity, not just a regulatory issue.
New York State Supreme Court building in Manhattan with inscription emphasizing justice, related to injunction blocking OCM dispensary closures.

NY Supreme Court Blocks OCM from Closing Licensed Dispensaries

More than 150 licensed dispensaries in New York won’t face forced closure or relocation after a state Supreme Court injunction blocked OCM’s reinterpretation of school-zone rules.

Business Resources

Continue to the category

Business & Strategy

Continue to the category

Trending